Say It Ain’t So, Bari Weiss

Bari Weiss

With all the turmoil over free speech rights, I can’t believe Bari Weiss, co-founder of The Free Press, is considering selling out for millions to David Ellison, the new owner of CBS News, and taking the job of editor in chief or co-president of the network.

Weiss started The Free Press as an unflinching alternative to traditional media organizations. She positioned herself and The Free Press as brave, independent, dogged, fierce, provocative, high impact, committed to separating the signal from the noise. 

CBS is the network that caved when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused “Face the Nation” of deceptively editing an interview with her. Two days later, CBS announced the show would now air only interviews that are conducted live, or are prerecorded with no cuts or edits, giving away its editorial freedom. Editing interviews for clarity and brevity is a common practice in the news business. Removing that authority will just let politicians bloviate and eat up time.

It was CBS’s parent company, Paramount Global, that was in the process of being taken over by Ellison, that settled an insane lawsuit with Donald Trump, agreeing to pay Trump $16 million over a 60 Minutes interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris in which Trump alleged that the editing was intentionally deceptive to favor Democrats. As Anya Schiffrin, at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs, has said, American media companies are demonstrating an unprecedented willingness to openly put their business interests ahead of their obligations to the public. “What’s happened in the last six months in the US is worse than anything we imagined,” she said.

It was Ellison who made commitments to the FCC that CBS’s “editorial decision-making reflects the varied ideological perspectives of American viewers”, that CBS would get rid of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and that CBS would create a new ombudsman position to review “any complaints of bias or other concerns.”

It was Ellison who appointed as that ombudsman Kenneth R. Weinstein, former head of a conservative-leaning Washington think tank, the Hudson Institute, who is likely to be a partisan enforcer. . 

It’s Ellison who, according to the Wall Street Journal,  wants to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery — the owner of Warner Bros. studios, HBO Max and cable news giant CNN, a deal that would require the approval of Trump’s regulators. What would Ellison, and Weiss, give to Trump to win that prize? Too much, I’m afraid.

At the September 21 memorial service for Charlie Kirk, Stephen Miller, the White House’s deputy chief of staff, said, “We will prevail over the forces of wickedness and evil. They cannot conceive of the army that they have arisen in all of us.” Trump spoke about how much he hates his political foes. Trump has  said that the major TV networks have been overwhelmingly “negative” about him and suggested that “maybe their license should be taken away.” 

Trump went on to undercut a message of national cohesion, saying of Kirk, “He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them, That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them.”

Don’t think Trump and his minions won’t do all they can to continue to pressure and manipulate the mainstream media going forward. Does Bari really want to be part of that cowardly crew?

Of Intrepid Men and Their Flying Machines

The plane was flying 3500 ft. above the vast Atlantic Ocean.

“Then, just as he was looking at the needle of the air-speed indicator, it froze in front of his eyes. He could smell smoke. Its sensor, mounted above his head, had become packed with sleet and jammed. The indicator was now useless. The turbulent wind made the aircraft sway and judder…To try to get his equilibrium back, he drew back the control column, hoping to pull the nose up. The aeroplane hung motionless for a second. Then it fell into a steep spiral dive.”

Charles A. Lindbergh in a single-engine plane, the Spirit of St. Louis, in May 1927, trying to complete the first solo, nonstop transatlantic flight?

Negative. 

It was eight years earlier in May 1919. The courageous pilot was Jack Alcock, a British aviator flying a modified Vickers Vimy bomber powered by two Rolls-Royce Eagle engines. Alcock was trying to complete a nonstop flight from St. John’s, Newfoundland, to Clifden, Ireland. Accompanying him as navigator was Arthur Whitten Brown. Brown, nicknamed “Teddy,” was born in Glasgow, Scotland, though his parents were Americans.

Alcock and Brown’s modified Vickers Vimy bomber

I’ve admired Lindbergh since I was a child, thrilled at his derring-do, self-reliance and a triumph of will against the odds. (Yes, I know he also had some less than admirable qualities) On a trip to Hawaii as an adult, I even made a special trip to visit his grave at the end of the road to Hana under the shade of a Java plum tree at Palapala Ho‘omau Church on Maui. I’ve read multiple books about Lindbergh, who became a sensational and lasting celebrity, and I always thought, as most Americans likely do, that he was the first to complete a nonstop transatlantic flight.

Then I came across a fascinating, dramatic, fast-paced book published in 2024, The Big Hop, by David Rooney. 

At a time when there seems to be few real heroes, Rooney’s compelling account reveals that Alcock and Brown, both veterans of WW I, were among a hardy group of men who took on the challenge of a contest sponsored by Lord Northcliffe, owner of The Daily Mail newspaper. Northcliffe   offered a £10,000 prize to the first aviators to fly non-stop across the Atlantic.

Alcock and Brown were no strangers to peril. Alcock had fought in multiple terrifying dogfights during WWI, earning a Distinguished Service Cross. Brown, captured by the Germans in 1915 after crashing his Flying Corps B.E.2c biplane in northeastern France during WWI, endured atrocious conditions in German prisoner-of-war camps. The camps, often run by sadistic commanders, offered scandalously meagre food rations, were often freezing, swarming with rats and mice, and were inattentive to the multiple injuries and health issues suffered by POWs.

To be eligible for Northcliffe’s prize, competitors had to comply with three basic conditions: the flight had to be between any point in Great Britain and any point in Canada, Newfoundland or the United States; the flight had to be non-stop; the flight had to be completed within 72 hours.

Three teams joined Alcock and Brown in Newfoundland to make the attempt at a continuous Atlantic crossing:

  • Harry Hawker and Kenneth Mackenzie-Grieve in a single engine Sopwith Atlantic
  • Frederick Raynham and C. W. F. Morgan in a single-engined Martinsyde Raymor
  •  A team led by Mark Kerr in a four-engined Handley Page V/1500 bomber Atlantic
Hawker’s Sopwith Atlantic

Hawker had a successful takeoff and managed to fly about 1000 miles, but the Sopwith’s engine failed and the plane went down in the ocean about 750 miles from Ireland. Hawker and Mackenzie-Grieve were rescued by a Danish steamer, the SS Mary.

Raynham and Morgan’s plane crashed on takeoff on Newfoundland, likely due to a heavy fuel load and rough terrain.

Raynham and Morgan’s Martinsyde Raymor

Mark Kerr’s team abandoned their attempt at a transatlantic crossing after Alcock and Brown successfully crossed the Atlantic.

Mark Kerr’s Handley Page V/1500 bomber Atlantic

Alcock later said that when his  modified Vickers Vimy bomber fell into a steep spiral dive during the transatlantic flight, the plane “began to perform circus tricks”—plunging toward the ocean while he fought desperately to remain aloft. One moment the altimeter read 1,000 feet, the next only 100. When they were just 65 feet above the waves, he succeeded in regaining control.

On 15 June 1919 a telegram from Alcock and Brown arrived at the Royal Aero Club with the message: ‘Landed Clifden, Ireland, at 8.40 am Greenwich mean time, June 15, Vickers Vimy Atlantic machine leaving Newfoundland coast 4.28 pm GMT, June 14, Total time 16 hours 12 minutes. Instructions awaited.’ 

As David Rooney wrote in The Big Hop, “Today, a transatlantic flight is an unremarkable part of everyday life. It is almost a chore. But somebody had to go first.”

The Vickers Vimy that Alcock and Brown flew on display in the London Science Museum

Memorials at Clifden and London’s Heathrow International Airport also commemorate their achievement.

A statue of Alcock & Brown. Originally on display at Heathrow Airport, it was relocated at the Heathrow Academy but was moved to Clifden in Ireland on 7 May for an eight-week stay to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the flight on 15 June.

ICE Creating High Crime DC Trump Deplores

The Free Press is reporting that D.C. police department supervisors have been under pressure to manipulate crime data to make it appear that violent crime has fallen compared to years past, according to the police union. ​

​“ ‘When our members respond to the scene of a felony offense where there is a victim reporting that a felony occurred, inevitably there will be a lieutenant or a captain that will show up on that scene and direct those members to take a report for a lesser offense,’ Fraternal Order of Police Chairman Gregg Pemberton said.” Sure, someone’s killed their girlfriend and is waving a gun in the air, but have you considered reporting it as a speeding ticket? The house has been broken into and the children are missing, but disorderly conduct has a better ring to it, I think. One police commander who allegedly changed crime data has been put on leave over it.

But wait a minute. Remember the guy, Sean Charles Dunn, 37, who was arrested for throwing a sandwich at an ICE agent in D.C.?

Daina Henry, a local transit police detective, detailed the altercation in a criminal complaint, alleging Dunn pointed his finger in the officer’s face and yelled, ‘Fuck you! You fucking fascists! Why are you here? I don’t want you in my city,’ minutes before ‘winding his arm back and forcefully throwing a sub-style sandwich’

Dunn has been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers and employees of the United States – a felony. The charge could mean prison time and significant fines.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a social media post Thursday that Dunn had been fired from his job as an international affairs specialist in the Justice Department’s criminal division. She then unleashed a diatribe on the incident. You’d think Dunn was a mass shooter. 

“If you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you,” Bondi said in a post on the social media platform X. “I just learned that this defendant worked at the Department of Justice — NO LONGER. Not only is he FIRED, he has been charged with a felony. This is an example of the Deep State we have been up against for seven months as we work to refocus DOJ. You will NOT work in this administration while disrespecting our government and law enforcement.”

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host, chimed in as well. “Let me be clear, if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, be certain we will come after you with the full weight of the law.,” Pirro said. “Our officers have a job to do, and they should not be abused in the process. This alleged assault is no joke – it’s a serious crime, and those who think otherwise will learn just how gravely mistaken they are.”

So much for charging people with a lesser offense to make it appear that violent crime has fallen in the nation’s capital. 

Misguided Charity: Portland’s Proposed Pearl District Homeless Shelter

There’s a saying of uncertain providence, “Give a Man a Fish, and You Feed Him for a Day. Teach a Man to Fish, and You Feed Him for a Lifetime”. 

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson wants to give the homeless in the Pearl District a fish. 

Wilson wants to turn an industrial building at NW 15th Avenue and NW Northrup Street into a so-called “low-barrier” overnight-only homeless shelter able to accommodate up to 200 people. An all-night warehouse for the homeless. According to the NW Examiner last month, the city and property owner Vanessa Sturgeon of Sturgeon
Development Partners signed a 12-year lease in May that Mayor Keith Wilson has described as a two-or-three-year
deal. The $18,000-a-month lease covers the main floor and part of a basement, a total of 16,000 square feet, to be used only for shelter for unhoused individuals.

Low-barrier means the people who stay there from 8pm to 6am wouldn’t have to show an ID, be sober (there’s be no sobriety checks) or drug-free, although alcohol and drugs would not be allowed. The 200- bed shelter at Northwest 15th will have only two showers and sex offenders will be allowed inside the low- barrier shelter because no one will be checking for IDs.

A critic posted on reddit: “It’s basically a night prison. 200 people, 6 toilets, low barrier, barely a snack, no meals, no counseling, no fresh clothing. And then they are going to “disperse” these people every morning near parks and schools.”

Potential overnighters could access a bed by standing in line before the shelter  opened. At a July 28, 2025, public forum at the Armory, Skyler Brocker-Knapp, who oversees the city’s shelter plan, said people will be handed a card with information about where to receive social services after leaving the shelter.

I still remember going to a free lunch for the homeless program in an underground Portland parking garage a number of years ago. Tables spread out across the center of the garage displayed a bounty of meal options put together by multiple well-meaning social justice volunteers, from sandwiches and lasagna to potato chips and hot ethic dishes. Homeless people streamed in, wearily assembled in slow-moving lines, grabbed hold of what they wanted and found a spot on the concrete floor to sit and eat.

It wasn’t uplifting. It was depressing.

Nobody was there to help the struggling people get their lives back on track, to inquire about the welfare of their children, or to make them aware of accessible pathways towards lasting change. The whole thing was a misguided feel-good effort at charity by naïve good Samaritans. 

More recently, I saw a group of fresh-faced, eager suburban teenage girls handing out sandwiches from the trunk of their car to homeless people at the Tom McCall Waterfront Park. That might have eased their consciences, but how, exactly, did that drive change?

As Kevin Dahlgren has noted in his Substack, @truthonthestreets, “We don’t have a homeless crisis; we have a mental health and addiction crisis. Unfortunately, many still treat the homeless crisis as if it’s a housing crisis and push for more and more shelter beds. The problem is these shelters are far too low a level of care for the majority of our mentally ill.”

“Many advocates for the homeless assume that homelessness is primarily due to the unaffordability of housing, rather than drug use, antisocial behavior, criminal activity or mental illness,” says Devon Kurtz, director of public safety policy at the conservative Cicero Institute. “From this assumption flows misguided confidence that living on the street is an unfortunate but preferable alternative to institutions that curb the civil liberties of individuals who are simply poor.  This assumption is wrong. In the largest survey of homeless Americans ever conducted, only 4% cited high housing costs as the primary reason they were homeless. Significant majorities said they had mental-health issues, had used illegal substances and had been to jail or prison for extended periods.”

A woman who directed a social service agency in the Portland area that served low-income families once told me the whole free food approach was “antiquated”, a long-ago discredited tactic , and that unrestricted aid was counterproductive.

So’s the proposed low-barrier Pearl District homeless shelter. 

Another Extremist Trump Appointment

The Pacific Northwest is in the national news with the appointment of Washington State’s Joe Kent to lead the National Counterterrorism Center.

The Center, which is charged with analyzing and detecting terrorist threats, leads the way for the government in analyzing, understanding, and responding to the terrorist threat.. Of course the supine Republican-led Senate confirmed Kent’s appointment on Wednesday, with only one Republican, Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, voting against Kent’s nomination to the role.

Joe Kent (Photo credit: Jenny Kane/Associated Press)

Kent initially went to Washington, D.C. in early 2025 when he was picked to be Chief of Staff for Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence.

Kent has said he plans to devote the Center’s resources to targeting Latin American gangs and other criminal groups tied to migration. “President Trump is committed to identifying these cartels and these violent gang members and making sure that we locate them and that we get them out of our country,” Kent said at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee in April.

Kent ran unsuccessfully for Congress as a Republican in Washington state’s Third Congressional District twice, once in 2022 and again in 2024, losing both times to Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez.

In 2022, he paid Graham Jorgensen, a member of the far-right military group the Proud Boys, for consulting work. He also worked with Joey Gibson, the founder of the Christian nationalist group Patriot Prayer.

In March 2022, Kent endorsed remarks by Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-NC) who had called Ukrainian President Volodymyr “a thug”.  He added, “We, the west at large, pushed (Russia) into this situation of encroachment”. 

“Zelenskyy was installed via a US backed color revolution, his goal is to move his county west so he virtue signals in woke ideology while using nazi battalions to crush his enemies,” Kent wrote on Twitter. “He was also smart enough to cut our elite in on the graft,” he said, while adding that Cawthorn “nailed it.”

At an April 2022 conservative political conference Kent claimed that Russian President Vladamir Putin’s demands to take over the highly disputed Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine were “very reasonable.”

The Associated Press reported that during his Senate confirmation hearing for the Counterterrorism post, Kent refused to distance himself from a conspiracy theory that federal agents had somehow instigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack at the Capitol. “We’re looking into whether elements of the government could have enhanced the criminal acuity of some of the rioters that day,” Kent also endorsed  false claims that Trump won the 2020 election over President Joe Biden.

 “No one who…says government-controlled agents were part of the Jan. 6 attacks should be in charge of counterterrorism – period,” Democratic Majority for Israel executive director Mark Mellman said in a statement on Kent’s nomination to be Director of the National Counterterrorism Center. “Joe Kent is a zealot whose blind devotion to an extremist ideology concerns us deeply.” 

Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), the top Democrat on the  the Senate Intelligence Committee, was also critical. “At a time when domestic violent extremism is one of the fastest-growing threats to the homeland, we are being asked to put someone in charge of counterterrorism who has aligned himself with political violence, promoted falsehoods that undermine our democracy, and tried to twist intelligence to serve a political agenda,” Warner said in a speech on the Senate floor.

As a side note, the appointment of Joe Kent to lead the National Counterterrorism Center is only slightly more despicable than the August 2, 2025 confirmation of former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia in a 50-45 vote along party lines. 

Jeannine Pirro (r) ( (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)

“She has supported Mr. Trump’s efforts to exact vengeance on his political enemies and backed his challenges to federal judges who have questioned the legality of his immigration policies,” The New York Times reported. “And she was vocal in raising doubts about the legitimacy of Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s election to the presidency in 2020.”

And so it goes.

“Portland, The City That Works” Ha!

If Portland works, it’s not very speedy. 

Portland started using fixed speed cameras to identify and fine drivers in 2016. It began by issuing warnings starting on Aug. 25 of that year for violations occurring on the SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway corridor. The program started issuing formal speeding tickets at the end of a 30-day trial period on Sept. 24, 2016.

 But a persistent problem quickly emerged. Every photograph had to reviewed and every citation had to be issued by a sworn police officer. That was creating a backlog in processing citations and hindering the city’s ability to expand its automated enforcement program. 

In 2020, Portland’s fixed speed cameras issued 38,502 tickets. Each one had to be reviewed by a sworn police officer, a massive time sink to say the least. 

It took until 2022 for a solution to be found, a notable victory for Portland. That was when the Legislature considered HB4105, which allowed the City of Portland to utilize non-police staff (specifically, “duly authorized traffic enforcement agents”) to review and issue citations based on photographs from fixed speed cameras, thereby freeing up police officers to focus on other duties.  

Support for the bill was widespread. 

“Allowing duly authorized enforcement agents to review citations will create more review capacity – while at the same time ensuring that appropriate training and certification for reviewing personnel are in place,” the City of Portland testified before the House Committee on Rules. “This will address police capacity as well as traffic safety needs.”

Multnomah County testified that requiring police officers to review and issue citations “reduces the capacity (of sworn police officers) for other police priorities and also creates a costly barrier to use of automated enforcement.”

“We are very concerned about the epidemic of traffic fatalities trending upward across Oregon,” said The Street Trust. “We would like you to rethink trac enforcement as an administrative function in order to increase municipal capacity to enforce traffic laws and to reduce costs to expand their automated traffic enforcement (ATE) programming in ways that meet local community’s needs.”

Dana Dickman, at the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT), testified that not only was each traffic safety camera violation being reviewed by a sworn police officer, but “100% of traffic safety camera violation review occurs on police overtime. Expanding the pool of qualified reviewers would lower the cost of this function.”

Reporting on HB 4105, Willamette Week noted that Portland was then advertising a starting salary for officers of $66,934. “In a 2,000-hour year, that’s $33.47 an hour. At time-and-a-half, an officer would be paid $50 an hour to review photo radar tickets.”

Willamette Week said those payments explained why the Portland police union opposed changing the law.

Once the bill passed, any sense of urgency in implementing the new law seemed to evaporate.

In December 2024, BikePortland noted that the change still wasn’t in place, even though the bill had been on the books for nearly two years. Jonathan Maus, publisher/editor of BikePortland’s news site, reported that he had asked the Portland Bureau of Transportation’s (PBOT) Communications Director, Hannah Schafer, about the status of implementing the new authority given to them in HB 4105. “PBOT is currently developing the program that will result in PBOT staff reviewing and issuing citations for moving violations from the automated enforcement cameras,” Schafer replied.

Bike Portland said PBOT expected to have about 40 cameras in operation and to be issuing 100,000 citations by 2025.

So here we are in July 2025 and sworn police officers are still reviewing each and every moving violation recorded by one of the city’s cameras. 

Earlier this month, Willamette Week reported that even though speed cameras have been effective, more have not been installed because, as PBOT spokesman Dylan Rivera put it, police officers are currently the ones to review all citations, mostly on overtime shifts, and the bureau is limited by police availability. They’re also hamstrung by capacity at the Multnomah County Circuit Court, which adjudicates the citations.

According to Willamette Week, PBOT says “it’s looking to hire three people who can review citations to alleviate the burden on police staffing and increase the number of tickets the city can process.”

PBOT’s Speed Safety Camera Program Manager, Steve Hoyt-McBeth, tells me he’s “very eager to get the program up and running” but the current holdup is funding”.

Hiring the positions has been held for approximately six months because of PBOT’s budget challenges, he said in an email. “I was hopeful that I’d be able to begin the recruitment this summer, but the lack of a funded state transportation package, which puts an approximately $11 million hole in PBOT’s FY25-26 has kept the pause button pressed.”

Hoyt-McBeth said part of the holdup is also tied to staff capacity to develop the program. “No municipality in Oregon currently utilizes the statutory authority to have Agents issue citations, so we have to develop the training and program ourselves without a template from another jurisdiction,” he said.

Clearly, this entire situation with the speed cameras has been mishandled by Portland, which continues to shell out overtime money to cops . But it seems the City Council is clueless. Meredith Washington, Community Liaison for Councilor Angelita Morillo, read this post and responded to me, “I’m unsure what your message is here.”

So, when are the Portland Police going to relinquish their lucrative overtime work on speed camera violations and pass it on to non-police staff?

Don’t hold your breath.

Trump’s Bullhorn: Does He Do ANYTHING Besides posting on Truth Social?

Creator: CHRIS DELMAS | Credit: AFP via Getty Images

Donald Trump fired off more than 50 posts on his social media platform, Truth Social, during Kamala Harris’ Democratic Convention speech in August 2024 

On Sunday, July 20, 2025, he posted 40 messages on Truth Social, bringing the total number of posts since his inauguration to 2,800.

He’s a damn machine with his stubby little fingers.

Previous presidents delivered significant, and even insignificant, policy pronouncements with carefully worded press releases that had been massaged by a raft of policy advisors. Trump just blurts things out, often in rambling, confusing word salad that veers off into unrelated topics. 

Instead of delivering carefully thought-out foreign policy statements, Trump spews out declarations at all hours of the day and night.  He probably would have announced “D-Day” , the June 6, 1944 invasion of Normandy, Franceduring WWII not with a stern, inspiring address to the nation but with a Truth Social post , “BOFFO!!!! WE DID IT. WE’RE SAVING THE FROGS. WATCH OUT KRAUTS. OUR TROOPS ARE ON YOUR DOORSTEP.”

On April 9, 2025, when the stock market was tanking, he posted: “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!” A few hours later, he announced a 90-day suspension of additional tariffs against dozens of countries, triggering a jump in the S&P 500 index. 

In June, he shared a meme of himself walking down a dark city street with all-cap text that read, “HE’S ON A MISSION FROM GOD & NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.” I doubt he knew the connection to the Blues Brothers line, “We’re on a mission from God”. 

On July 21, 2025, in a bizarre effort to deflect public attention from the Epstein controversy, Trump shared an AI-generated fake video from a MAGA TikTok user depicting the arrest and imprisonment of Barack Obama after posting about Tulsi Gabbard’s claims that the Obama administration engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” to subvert his 2016 election victory. This followed another weird AI-generated video he posted on Truth Social in February depicting his plans for real estate development in Gaza, depicting Elon Musk and a shirtless Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu vacationing at a “Trump Gaza” resort in the Palestinian territory.

On July 22, 2025, he took time out from his busy day to whine about late night TV hosts: “The word is, and it’s a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, Fallon will be gone. These are people with absolutely NO TALENT, who were paid Millions of Dollars for, in all cases, destroying what used to be GREAT Television. It’s really good to see them go, and I hope l played a major part in it!”

To some degree, Trump is probably wailing into the void, since only about 5 million people use Truth social each month. But his posts, no matter how garbled, vitriolic or non-sensical, often get picked up by other media and spread far and wide., multiplying his audience .

He often ends his rambling texts with curt sign-offs like “Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

We’d all probably be a lot better off if we ignored him.

OPB is facing a Big Hole. Will Donors step Up?

Oregon Public Broadcasting (OPB) is in trouble.

A bill clawing back $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which provides funding for NPR and PBS, including OPB, has passed the Senate. It is expected to pass the House next and then to be sent to President Trump for his signature. 

Are you and thousands of other Oregonians prepared to start or increase donations to OPB to replace the federal money it now relies on?

Public radio across the country is already begging for money. On July 18, Alyson Brokenshire, Senior Director, Principal and Major Gifts at PBS News Hour sent out a message: “For the first time in history, Congress voted to zero out funding for public media, including PBS News HourThis decision creates a critical funding challenge for us, but one we can meet with your sustaining support.”  WBUR in Boston also sent out a plea on July 18: “Give. Longtime listener or reader? Become a first-time donor at this pivotal moment. Give again. Thank you, a million times over, for being in our corner. Give more. Help us close this $1.6-million funding gap, right now. Give every month. When you become a Sustainer, we know we can rely on you. Month after month. Year after year.”

In fiscal year 2023, government grants to OPB totaled $4,679,653 or 9.5% of the station’s $49,370,988 in revenue from contributions, including sponsorships.[1]

I’m already a sustaining contributor to OPB. I provide ongoing, monthly financial support through automatic deductions from a credit card. I recently increased my monthly donations because of the threats of funding cuts by the Trump administration. Am I prepared to donate even more when those cuts are real?

My sense is that OPB has a tough road ahead if it tries to replace all of the $4,679,653 in annual federal support it now receives. 

Current economic uncertainty is one thing likely to impact fundraising. There is already evidence that such uncertainty is leading people to scale back on discretionary spending, including charitable donations.Nonprofit giving in the US has taken a $65 billion hit since 2021, according to Philanthropy.org. 

Another reality is that a substantial percentage of America’s private wealth is held by conservative and center-right donors, many of whom are wary of institutions they perceive as liberal, and many of whom see public media as liberal. That perception was recently reinforced by Uri Berliner, a former senior business editor at NPR. In 2024, he wrote a blistering critique of NPR in The Free Press, accusing it of lacking viewpoint diversity and of a drift towards a progressive ideology

Trump administration officials and members of Congress have piled on, claiming that NPR and PBS push “left-wing propaganda” and accusing them of violating the CPB’s nonpartisan mandate.

Never one to be subtle, Trump has mercilessly blasted public radio and television. “NPR and PBS, two horrible and completely biased platforms (Networks!), should be DEFUNDED by Congress, IMMEDIATELY,” Trump wrote late Wednesday on Truth Social. “Republicans, don’t miss this opportunity to rid our Country of this giant SCAM, both being arms of the Radical Left Democrat Party. JUST SAY NO AND, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”

“NPR and PBS have increasingly become radical, left-wing echo chambers for a narrow audience of mostly wealthy, white, urban liberals and progressives,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) said at a subcommittee hearing earlier this spring, 

Could OPB survive without the federal grants or any increase in donations? Probably, but the hit would be hard, though not as hard as the likely hit on KCUW in Pendleton, OR, which relied on federal money for 98% of its revenue in 2023. KCUW is is managed by members of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he secured a deal from the White House that some funding administered by the Interior Department would be repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in about a dozen states, but there’s no firm provision in the bill for that.

The impact of any cut in OPB’s programming would be felt particularly by Oregon and Southern Washington’s more educated and higher income populace (71% of OPB’s TV audience, 82% of OPB’s digital audience and 85% of OPB’s radio audience has attended college). The public broadcast audience also typically falls into higher household income categories and have for years, primarily because households that listen to public media tend to have more formal education.

One potential threat to any OPB fundraising outreach is the changing media landscape and its burgeoning cost. 

Not only are media outlets multiplying, but alternative media are increasingly soliciting subscriptions. I have long subscribed to the Wall Street Journal (that subscription alone costs me $779.88 a year) and the New York Times, but added a subscription to Bari Weiss’ Common Sense newsletter, later renamed The Free Press, in 2021. I have since added subscriptions to a raft of other Substack publications with various points of view.  

I also make contributions to a number of Oregon and national non-profits, the Ukrainian Freedom Fund, and a Ukrainian news site, The Kyiv Independent.  And once in a while I’m a sucker for a GoFundMe plea. 

My point is, like many Oregonians, I’m already heavily invested in trying to do good. But there’s a limit. Periodically, I have to cull my subscriptions and donations because the cost gets out of hand. This means reprioritizing. And in the case of public broadcasting, fundraising pleas are going to come from various entities competing against each other for support, including individual programs, such as PBS News Hour, and individual stations, such as OPB and KCUW.

If OPB wants to replace the $4,679,653 in government financing it is set to lose, it is going to have to convince a lot of people to up their giving or chip in for the first time. 

This at a time when Oregon’s economy is facing a period of sluggish growth and some signs of weakness, with potential big givers from companies like Intel and Nike under stress and smaller givers uncertain about their economic prospects. President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act is also likely to put pressure on many Oregonians and the state budget and there’s potential harm from Trump’s aggressive tariffs.

All food for thought.


[1] In most instances, sponsorships are considered charitable contributions by the underwriters.  On OPB’s IRS Form 990, these sponsorships are included in the $49,370,988 reported as contributions and grants. There is also a small amount of sponsorships that meet the definition of advertising, which primarily occur on OPB’s digital platforms.  For FY 23, advertising is included in the program service revenue of $1,381,015 and in unrelated business revenue reported on OPB’s IRS Form 990-T.  

For FY 23, advertising is included in the program service revenue of $1,381,015 and in unrelated business revenue reported on our IRS Form 990-T.  Sponsorships are not otherwise disclosed on the tax filings.  Total revenue was $56,821,607.

Notable Sources of Revenue$Percent of Total Revenue
Contributions$49,370,988             86.9%
Program Services$1,381,015               2.4%
Investment Income$3,446,034               6.1%
Bond Proceeds$0 
Royalties$0 
Rental Property Income$415,851                0.7%
Net Fundraising$0 
Sales of Assets$2,207,719                 3.9%
Net Inventory Sales$0 
                                                                       

Figures are from Form 990 which non-profits are required to file annually with the IRS. These CPB grants are included in the Contributions and Grants revenue of $49,370,988 on OPB’s FY 2023 IRS Form 990. CPB grants are not included in government grants on the Form 990 as CPB is a private, nonprofit corporation, not a government agency. 

Trump’s Man in Malaysia: A Foreign Policy Blunder in the Making

If President Trump really wants to undermine American influence in Asia, he should insult Asian countries by nominating incompetent and offensive ambassadors to serve there. Oh wait. He’s already doing that.

On July 9, Trump nominated Nick Adams to be the next U.S. Ambassador to Malaysia. Adams was born in Australia, emigrated to the United States in 2012 and became an American citizen in 2021.

Once asked by The Sydney Morning Herald why he had left Australia for the United States, Adams replied: “Because I love guns, hot dogs, chicken fried steak, barbecue, cheerleaders, American football, small town parades, beauty pageants, pickup trucks, muscle cars and 16-lane freeways lined with supersized American flags.”

The New York Times has described him as “an early, fawning supporter of Mr. Trump” and cited his “incendiary rhetoric and vulgar humor that elevated him to political prominence”. Questions have also been raised about his role at the Foundation for Liberty and American Greatness, a non-profit he founded in 2016.[1]

A prolific poster on social media (Adams has 625,000 followers on the social media platform X), he is unstinting in his ceaseless praise of Trump. “Just like King David from the Bible, President Trump is a good shepherd, and we are his flock!,” he posted on July 6.  “President Trump should be added to Mount Rushmore, he should have a monument built on the National Mall, and he should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,” Adams posted on June 24. 

He has “amassed a conservative following with his over-the-top ‘alpha male’ persona”, making him “part of an unruly world of online content that primarily appeals to young men, known as the manosphere,” the New York Times reported. 

In 2023, Adams posted on X, “I go to Hooters. I eat rare steaks. I lift extremely heavy weights. I read the Bible every night. I am pursued by copious amounts of women. I am wildly successful. I have the physique of a Greek God. I have an IQ over 180. I am extremely charismatic. They hate this,” Adams posted on X in 2023.

Typical of his alpha male shtick, the Washington Post reported he had written  about “how if your wife is ‘high-maintenance’ then you’re a ‘loser’ no matter how hot she is,” and at  at a Capitol Hill Club Young Republicans gathering in Washington, D.C. , he said “ ‘nasty women’ are coming for two things: your mind and your testicles!”

Adams’ reputation precedes him in Asia. “Having risen to prominence on a wave of machismo, misogyny and crass humour, Mr Adams’ controversial online history includes Islamophobic comments, denigrating Mr Trump’s political rivals as supporters of Islam and railing against purported efforts to “teach Islam in schools,” reported The Straits Times, a Singaporean daily English-language newspaper. 

 “US President Donald Trump’s nomination of controversial internet personality Nick Adams as the next US ambassador to Malaysia has raised not only eyebrows but also questions about the fiery right-wing influencer’s suitability for the role and the state of relations between Washington and the Muslim-majority nation going forward,” The Straits Times said. Mainly Muslim ethnic Malays form the majority or nearly 60 per cent of the country’s 35 million population.

The South China Morning Post reported that Adams would be “a wrong fit” for Muslim-majority Malaysia which favors quiet diplomacy over headline-grabbing rhetoric. 

I’ve lived in Malaysia and I know it is a key United States partner in promoting regional stability and economic growth. That’s particularly the case in its position as the current chair of The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), a regional grouping of states in Southeast Asia “that aims to promote economic and security cooperation among its ten members.” 

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has criticized Trump’s long-threatened tariffs as “sharpened instruments of geopolitical rivalry” and has opposed American support for Israel’s actions in Gaza.

 “He (Adams) will have to tread a delicate and sophisticated line as the US and Malaysia negotiate trade tariffs, joust over their respective relationships with China and deal with an increasingly unstable geopolitical climate,” reported The Guardian

The Policy Circle has also pointed out, “The U.S. has a variety of interests at stake in the Asia Pacific region, with pressing diplomatic, national security, and economic considerations, all against the backdrop of increased geopolitical volatility.”

Will any of this matter to the Senate when, or if, it holds a vote on Adams’ nomination? 

Probably not, given the slavish behavior of Senate Republicans in pursuing Trump’s agenda. 

After all, Charles Kushner, Ivanka Trump’s father-in-law, was confirmed by the Senate as the United States Ambassador to France and Monaco in May by a vote of 51 to 45. This despite his previous conviction and prison sentence for tax evasion, witness tampering, and illegal campaign contributions, for which he was pardoned by President Trump in 2020. 

And Trump’s nomination of Kimberly Guilfoyle, a brash former model, former wife of now California Gov. Gavin Newsom, former Fox News personality and former fiancée of Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., to serve as Ambassador to Greece appears to be moving along. 

Kimberly Guilfoyle speaking at Republican National Convention, July 17, 2024

With these precedents, why block an unqualified, crude, vulgar, Islamophobic alpha male from his confirmation?


[1] The Foundation for Liberty and American Greatness, (FLAG) is a non-profit “dedicated to promoting and providing high-quality civics education that informs students and families about the greatness of America and the power of the American Dream”. Nick Adams is Executive Director. According to a Form 990 filed with the Internal Revenue Service, Adams worked an average of 50 hours per week on Foundation business and was the only paid employee, in 2023 earning $411,209. That was a hefty increase from his 2022 compensation of $248,251. Why do so many of these political funds end up being just vehicles for personal grift?

Kate Brown and the Willamette Falls Trust: Fess Up

Kate Brown at Willamette Falls

Former Oregon governor, Kate Brown, and the Willamette Falls Trust don’t appear to be big on public disclosure. 

On June 4, 2024, the Willamette Falls Trust announced Brown had been selected as the group’s new president. She occupied her new position on May 28, taking over from Andrew Mason, who led the trust’s work for more than six years.

Willamette Falls Trust, created in 2015, is based in Oregon City. Made up of local, regional and tribal leaders, it is a non-profit working to promote and preserve public access to the Falls. It’s likely Brown’s appointment was based, in part, on an assumption she could secure state funding for the Trust. 

That bet paid off.

As the Legislature’s 2025 session ended, it approved giving $45 million to the Trust. The money will go toward the purchase of 60 acres of property on the West Linn side of the waterfall. 

But the appropriation was not without controversy. Willamette Week reported that the Grand Ronde Tribe, which has historic treaty rights at Willamette Falls, had urged Gov. Tina Kotek not to give money to the trust. Grand Ronde tribal chairwoman Cheryle Kennedy panned the appropriation. “Any state investment in land at Willamette Falls must center the voices and rights of Tribal nations with ancestral ties to this sacred site, not a private nonprofit,” Grand Ronde tribal chairwoman Cheryle Kennedy told Willamette Week. 

Going forward, you’d think the Trust would want to be transparent and straightforward about its operations in order to secure public support for its mission, but from the start it has been tight-lipped about what it’s paying Brown. Is it appropriate, modest, extravagant, embarrassingly over the top?

I e-mailed Brown asking her directly what total compensation she received from the Trust in 2024 and what her projected total compensation is for 2025. 

David Perry, Vice President of Internal Operations at the Trust, responded, saying Brown asked him to reply.Unfortunately, all personnel matters, including employee compensation, are considered confidential so I cannot provide the answers to your questions directly,” he said. 

He noted, however, that Brown’s 2024 compensation will be noted in annual report the Trust and all other Oregon non-profits are required to file annually with the Internal Revenue Service and the Oregon Department of Justice. Those 2024 reports will be filed no later than November 15, 2025. Financial information for 2025 will go through a similar review and filing process, so will not be available until late 2026, he said.

As the conservative commentator John Stossel often says, “Give me a break!”.

The Trust, which is in line to receive an infusion of $45 million in taxpayer funds, wants to hide Kate Brown’s 2024 compensation until mid-November 2025 and her 2025 compensation until November 2026. 

Why? 

UPDATE: August 1, 2025 –  Gov. Kotek weighs whether to veto funds for Willamette Falls inter-tribal project, OPB

Kotek’s office stated Thursday that she is considering a veto of a budget line item from the Legislature’s “Christmas Tree” bill that allocated funding for all sorts of projects and initiatives, including the Willamette Falls project. 

“[Kotek] is exercising her due diligence to understand more fully the use of these dollars and wants to hear more from all interested parties,” the governor’s office wrote. 

The announcement came amid an ongoing conflict among regional tribes over both the project and fishing access at Willamette Falls.