The Epstein Saga: So Many Were Complicit

Jeffrey Epstein

Karyna Shuliak, a native of Belarus, emigrated to the United States with Jeffrey Epstein’s help, becoming his lover, confidant, beneficiary of his vast wealth and ignorer of his treatment of other women, many of whom would later claim to be victims of his abuse. That’s what the New York Times reported on July 26 in a lengthy expose.

With Epstein’s help, Shuliak married another woman in New York, figuring that “might be the easiest way to gain U.S. citizenship without raising red flags that the marriage was arranged solely to avoid deportation”, according to the Times. 

They jetted around the world together and he funneled payments of nearly $1 million to her over the years. He also sent tens of thousands of dollars to her parents in Belarus, the Times reported. 

With Epstein’s death, Shuliak could inherit as much as $100 million from his estate, the Times reported.

While much of the coverage of Epstein’s behavior has focused on his exploitation of young girls and woman, the Times article revealed something equally appalling — the extent to which other people were complicit. Throughout his miserable life, Epstein relied on the willingness of other people to accommodate him, to protect him by ignoring his transgressions, to obscure his motives, to assist in his abuses. 

One notably complicit player was Alexander Acosta.

According to a May 12, 2026 report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Epstein was arrested on charges of solicitation of prostitution in 2006, after the stepmother of a 14-year-old girl reported to police that an older man had molested her stepdaughter. In Florida, local, state, and federal law enforcement investigated the case for years, compiling extensive evidence from dozens of victims.

But, under pressure from Epstein’s stable of prominent attorneys, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Alexander Acosta negotiated a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) under which Epstein served only 13 months in jail on state charges of solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of a minor. Signed in 2007, the deal shielded Epstein and “any potential co-conspirators” from future federal prosecution by Acosta’s office for a set of sex crimes. The NPA negotiated by Alex Acosta, with its narrow guilty plea and lenient sentence, enabled Epstein to continue his abuse and trafficking activities for almost another decade.

Acosta later served as Secretary of Labor under President Trump from April 2017 until his resignation in July 2019. 

In Shuliak’s case, the complicit helpers were numerous, according to the Times.

Shuliak had always wanted to be a dentist. In 2012, after Columbia’s College of Dental Medicine initially rejected her, Epstein asked his dentist, Dr. Thomas J. Magnani, a powerful alumnus, to put him in contact with the dental school dean. Mr. Epstein dangled the idea of making up to a $10 million donation. In the end, he would give only about $210,000 to Columbia, according to an accounting by the university, but it was enough to grease the wheels.

Then Dr. James Fine, a dental school administrator, gave Dr. Shuliak a heads-up on the topics she would encounter during an admissions exam in April 2012 to test her practical skills as a transfer student. 

By the time she applied to Columbia in 2012, Shuliak had overstayed the student visa she had obtained in 2010. Epstein chose, from the ranks of his assistants, a 30-year-old woman from Minnesota to be her spouse and the women were married three weeks later at the Office of the City Clerk.

After the wedding, a Brooklyn immigration lawyer unnamed by the Times who worked for Epstein submitted an immigration form stating that the woman wanted to list Dr. Shuliak as her wife and beneficiary. The request was approved, and unnamed complicit immigration officials dismissed Shuliak’s pending deportation proceedings. Months after the marriage, Shuliak got a green card, making her a lawful resident. Attempts to use marriage to get a U.S. green card usually face very strict checks, with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) looking closely at applications to stop marriage fraud. In May 2018, she officially became a U.S. citizen, then divorced her spouse a year later.

According to the 2026 report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Shuliak’s former wife claimed she had been forced into marriage. Even though the report concluded that the marriage may have been done to provide Shuliak with the “legal basis to continue residing in the United States” it didn’t recommend any legal challenge to her citizenship. You could consider that failure being complicit in fraud as well. 

The congressional report is replete with stories of people who helped Epstein in his pursuit of women to abuse. 

According to the report, New York immigration lawyer, Mehmet Arda Beskardes, worked closely with Epstein from 2013 to 2018, helping Epstein arrange visas and other immigration documents for the women in his network. On one occasion, the report said, he may have facilitated an illusory marriage between Shuliak, and one of Epstein’s victims, apparently to provide Shuliak a legal basis to continue residing in the United States.

Epstein’s accountant, Richard Kahn, also wrote a letter to immigration authorities in support of the marriage, later acknowledging that the letter was “embellished”, the report said. 

The Times reported further that in 2023, when Shuliak applied for a postdoctoral dental program at Columbia, apparently to fulfill a requirement she needed to obtain a license to practice in the state, the same two dentists who helped her gain admission to Columbia in 2012 once again came to her assistance, according to a copy of her admissions file reviewed by The Times. The file shows that Dr. Fine, the dean overseeing Columbia’s postgraduate residency programs, created a special “faculty internship” for her at the Midtown Manhattan dental practice he shared with Dr. Magnani.

Both men gave her their highest recommendation for the program, the Times said, from which she graduated in May 2025. 

It looks like the roster of those complicit in Epstein’s predations also may include some officials at the Interlochen Center for the Arts in Michigan, which Epstein attended as a teenage bassoonist and later supported with donations.

On July 28, 2026, the New York Times reported that Epstein returned to mingle with students, several of whom later said they had been subjected to his grooming and abuse. A report by a law firm hired by the school included the accounts of two of the three former Interlochen students who have described disturbing encounters with Mr. Epstein. In one case, a woman told the investigators of going to meet him at the campus lodge where “Epstein engaged in sexual conduct with her….” 

The Times said the report included additional claims by a former Interlochen student who told investigators that Epstein had paid for her to fly to New York the summer after she graduated, and that she had given him a massage at his home and he “may have asked her to remove her top.” Her mother called Interlochen, her mother told investigators, to warn the school that Mr. Epstein was “preying on their students,” but they said no one from Interlochen had followed up.

And the list of those complicit in Epstein’s behavior goes on. It’s criminal.

Will all these complicit people pay a price. Maybe not in the courts, but, hopefully in their souls. As Dostoevsky wrote in The Brothers Karamazov, “Above all, don’t lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others.”

Despite pledges, politicians fail to shed tainted donations. Surprise!

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) says he’ll offset $7,000 in campaign contributions he’s received from accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein by donating an equivalent amount to anti-sex trafficking and anti-violence against women groups.

Don’t count on it.

In 2017, when multiple women went public with accusations that Harvey Weinstein had sexually harassed them, Democratic politicians, including Schumer, leaped to disassociate themselves from him. In particular, they promised to donate Weinstein’s now-tainted campaign contributions to charity.

schumer_corporate_taxes_0

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

Schumer was prominent among numerous politicians scurrying to say they would make amends. Federal Election Commission (FEC) records show that Weinstein donated $20,700 to the Friends of Schumer campaign finance committee during 2013-2017.

“Sen. Schumer is donating all of the (Weinstein) contributions to several charities supporting women,” Matt House, a spokesman for Sen. Schumer, told the Washington Post in October 2017.

weinstein 4

Harvey Weinstein

Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel praised Schumer  for doing the right thing.

She was too quick in her praise.

FEC records reveal that Schumer’s campaign committee didn’t donate one thin dime to charities supporting women in 2017 or 2018.

During that same period, Schumer’s committee also received contributions from the DNC Services Corp (Democratic National Committee), to which Weinstein had donated $203,458.

There’s no evidence that Schumer’s committee re-distributed any of that money to women’s groups either.

To its apparent credit, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) said it would donate $30,000 of the funds it had received from Weinstein to three non-profits:

  • Emily’s List, a political action committee that aims to help elect pro-choice Democratic female candidates to office.
  • Emerge America, an organization that recruits, trains and provides a network to Democratic women who want to run for office, and
  • Higher Heights, a national organization working to elect Black women, influence elections and advance progressive policies.

FEC records of the DNC’s expenditures in 2017-2018 reveal that it lived up to its promise.

On Oct. 30, 2017, the DNC sent Emily’s List $10,290.15.  (The DNC also sent $5,000 to Emily’s List on May 25, 2017, but that was before the Weinstein scandal erupted.)

The DNC also sent $10,290.15 to both Emerge America and Higher Heights on Oct. 30, 2017. It sent $1250 to Higher Heights on Sept. 29.

But there was a hitch. The DNC collected $300,000 in donations from Weinstein, not $30,000. It kept the other $270,000.

Other Democratic politicians, including some who are now running for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, also had received funds from Weinstein and also made a lot of promises to send the money to deserving non-profits. The announced recipients, however, were largely organizations that would launder the money right back to Democrats and their causes.

Even then, not all the politicians followed through on their commitments.

  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D- MA) said she’d donate $5,000 she received from Weinstein to Casa Myrna, a nonprofit group in Massachusetts. The FEC’s records on expenditures of the Elizabeth Warren Action Fund during 2017-2018 don’t show any payments to Casa Myrna.
  • Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said she would donate $10,000 received from Weinstein to RAAIN, (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network), an anti-sexual violence organization. No such donation is reported in FEC records of expenditures by Gillibrand’s 2017-2018 campaign finance committees.
  • Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) said he’d send Weinstein’s donations to the Minnesota Indian Women’s Resource Center. According to OpenSecrets.org, Weinstein donated a total of $17,300 to Franken and his Midwest Values PAC. None of Franken’s campaign finance committees recorded on FEC.org show a donation to the Minnesota Indian Women’s Resource Center during 2017-2018.
  • Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) said she would give $5,000 she received from Weinstein to a women’s rights nonprofit, Equal Rights Advocates. FEC records on Harris’ campaign finance committees do not show such a donation during 2017-2018.
  • Bob Casey (D-PA) said he’d give $2,190 he received from Weinstein to the Women’s Center and Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh. FEC records on Casey’s campaign finance committees do not show such a donation.
  • The Clinton Foundation’s website says Weinstein has donated between $100,001 – $250,000 to the Foundation. In Oct. 2017, the Foundation announced it had no plans to return Weinstein’s contributions, saying they had already been spent on charitable programs. According to the Foundation’s Form 990 report to the IRS, it had net assets of $323,470,879 at the end of 2017.

Looks like a lot of politicians’ promises are no more than empty public relations gestures.  Surprise!