Meg Whitman, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise CEO, is campaigning for Hillary Clinton in Denver, CO today.
This is a woman who, in her losing bid to become governor of California as a Republican in 2010, called for:
- Eliminating burdensome business taxes
- Eliminating a cap on charter schools
- Barring illegal immigrants from state colleges and universities.
- Ending “outrageous spending” on a growing state bureaucracy
- Reducing overall state spending
- No amnesty for people in the United States illegally, construction of a fence on the Mexican border,
- Repealing Obamacare
- Requiring minors to notify a guardian or parent prior to an abortion
- Enforcing the Three Strikes law because it was “instrumental in keeping violent criminals out of our communities”
- An end to the Dream Act because it wasn’t fair to legal residents.
I could go on and on, but it is abundantly clear that Whitman’s political views, based on her 2010 gubernatorial campaign, are diametrically opposed to those of Hillary Clinton.
Hillary, for example, wants to:
- Increase federal spending by $1.8 trillion over the next decade.
- Increase the national debt to 86% of GDP over the next decade.
- Expand benefits under an already troubled Social Security program.
- Expand Obamacare
- Increase various business taxes
- Impose new fees on financial institutions
- Enact liberal immigration reforms
Whitman’s support for Clinton today, then, can only be seen as an abandonment of her principles and a cynical ploy to secure a position in a new Clinton administration.
So forget about all the kudos for Republicans like Whitman who say they’ll vote for Hillary.
As Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Sonia Sotomayor said, “There is indeed something deeply wrong with a person who lacks principles, who has no moral core.”