Playing fast and loose: Multnomah County and the Wapato Jail

wapatojail

The still empty Wapato Jail

Has Multnomah County been flouting the law in its management of the Wapato jail?

In 1996, Multnomah County voters approved a $79.7 million public-safety bond measure to deal with inmate crowding and predictions of rising crime.

Of the total, $43.9 million went toward construction of the $58.4 million Wapato Jail in North Portland. The 168,420 sq. ft. jail was completed in 2004…and has sat empty ever since.

Now some folks, including Multnomah County Commissioner Loretta Smith, want to turn the jail into a giant homeless shelter. But other county officials are adamant the jail is unsuitable for such a use.

A major reason is because county officials have chosen to do what was convenient, rather than what was right.

When property at the County Sheriff’s office or other county jails broke or got too old or just needed replacing, rather than buying something new, the county ransacked Wapato.

“What people think is out there is a fully functioning building with kitchens and everything. It has none of that. It’s been stripped bare,” County spokesman Dave Austin told KGW-TV. “What we did was, if the sheriff’s office in their other three jails had a need for something — you know a big stove, an oven, a dishwasher — if those broke, we didn’t spend taxpayer dollars and buy new stuff. We went and took the stuff from Wapato.”

It would cost taxpayers at least $5 million to $7 million to replace all the stuff that was spirited away and get Wapato ready for occupancy, Austin told KOIN 6 News.

That’s right. County employees have ripped off $5-$7 million of Wapato property for other uses.

The problem is the 1996 bond measure for Wapato didn’t say that after the county built the jail, it could loot it.

The Dec. 17, 1996 Official Statement, the offering document delivered to prospective investors for the $79.7 million of bonds that were sold in the public market, specified that the bond proceeds would be used for the following:

  • Increase jail beds to end unsupervised early release of prisoners
  • Secure treatment facilities for mandatory drug and alcohol treatment of offenders
  • Computer systems and high-tech equipment for tighter tracking of criminals
  • Restructured booking facilities to eliminate delays for police
  • Expansion of the juvenile justice complex
  • Child Abuse Center

 In 2003, the State authorized the County to shift from building the bed alcohol and drug / work release / mental health beds to building 300 jail beds, instead, raising the total number of Wapato jail beds to 525 and committing $58.4 million to the project.

Wapato Jail was finally completed in July 2004.

But one thing didn’t change with all the machinations. There was still no provision allowing for the Wapato jail to be raided of contents worth millions so they could be shifted to other facilities.

A California case supports the view that such slippery shenanigans are prohibited.

In 2008, voters in the San Diego, CA Unified School District authorized $2.1 billion in general obligation bonds for school projects listed in a 96-page pamphlet. Later that year, voters challenged the District’s use of general obligation bond proceeds for the acquisition and installation of field lighting for the football stadium at a local high school.

In 2013, the California Court of Appeal determined in Taxpayers for Accountable School Bond Spending v. San Diego Unified School Dist. that the school district’s failure to make explicit reference to the installation of stadium lighting within the site-specific section of a bond project list rendered that expenditure unlawful.

Maybe some folks involved in pillaging the Wapato Jail should be in it.

 

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Playing fast and loose: Multnomah County and the Wapato Jail

  1. There is still more to the deceitful management of the
    Wapato Jail. A levy was passed by voters that funded the OPERATION of Wapato. So where is the accountability for that money? Inquiring minds WANT to know!!!!!
    Also, $5million to equip Wapato for the homeless? I suspect a lot of that pilfered cost was in technical equipment that would not be necessary for shelter use. I’d like to see that number challenged.

    • Shayla,

      The operating costs issue is separate from the jail construction bond. When Multnomah County residents voted on the jail bond they also voted on Measure No. 26-42, ” A 3-year levy to operate jails, book suspects, track criminals” .

      Some basic facts, according to Nov. 29, 2004 memo from Dave Boyer, the county’s Chief Financial Officer, to the Board of County Commissioners and others:

      a) The 1996 Public Safety Three year Levy passed in May 1996 was a significant expansion from the 1993 levy. It not only contemplated operating additional facilities, it covered far more of the Sheriff’s support operations than the 1993 levy.

      b) The 1996 levy anticipated the new jail operations for 210 jail beds and 150 A&D programs. The completed jail has 525 jail beds.

      c) Measure 47 was passed in November and drastically changed the property tax system in the State of Oregon. Because of the shortcomings of Measure 47, the 1997 legislature amended it and the voters approved Measure 50 in May of 1997.

      d) The combination of Measure 47/50 and the amounts included in the 1996 levy made operating the facilities contemplated in 1995 a fiscal problem for the County.

      Hope this helps.

  2. If the sheriff’s office had been regulated by the county, this might not have happened , vote this November to make the sheriff an appointment instead of by the voter, you cannot blame the county, blame the sheriff’s department , the commissioners do NOT HAVE financial oversight on that department , or didn’t you know that.

  3. We need an independent third party to go in and audit as to what would be necessary to use this as an emergency shelter and warming center. Maybe a forensic auditing class or some such from PSU or University of Portland, or one of the other schools. I do not think the county is willing or able to do a realistic evaluation. There seems to be some problem with turf or face or something, and evaluating themselves just would not be a good idea anyway. Maybe even somebody from the Community Warehouse could do this, if they are not too closely related to government to be independent? Also, there are stored cots somewhere in Portland, I believe, because I helped to set some up years ago after the Katrina disaster (they never got used–Louisiana is far away, and I guess the people chose Texas for more warmth and closer proximity). If the cots are just in storage somewhere, excuse me, but why can’t we use them for our own people? The excuses I have heard from the county are just embarrassing. If Food Not Bombs can prepare wonderful meals for people using old church kitchens, we do not have to have a kitchen like that of the Nines here. The County should lease the thing to a consortium of churches, veterans’ groups, and others who have already supported homeless programs. It is shameful to keep people out of publicly owned property when there is so much need. There are a lot of skill sets among homeless people as well, and the need for work may be as great as the need for anything else. It is just wrong not to address this issue as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s