The Epstein Saga: So Many Were Complicit

Jeffrey Epstein

Karyna Shuliak, a native of Belarus, emigrated to the United States with Jeffrey Epstein’s help, becoming his lover, confidant, beneficiary of his vast wealth and ignorer of his treatment of other women, many of whom would later claim to be victims of his abuse. That’s what the New York Times reported on July 26 in a lengthy expose.

With Epstein’s help, Shuliak married another woman in New York, figuring that “might be the easiest way to gain U.S. citizenship without raising red flags that the marriage was arranged solely to avoid deportation”, according to the Times. 

They jetted around the world together and he funneled payments of nearly $1 million to her over the years. He also sent tens of thousands of dollars to her parents in Belarus, the Times reported. 

With Epstein’s death, Shuliak could inherit as much as $100 million from his estate, the Times reported.

While much of the coverage of Epstein’s behavior has focused on his exploitation of young girls and woman, the Times article revealed something equally appalling — the extent to which other people were complicit. Throughout his miserable life, Epstein relied on the willingness of other people to accommodate him, to protect him by ignoring his transgressions, to obscure his motives, to assist in his abuses. 

One notably complicit player was Alexander Acosta.

According to a May 12, 2026 report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Epstein was arrested on charges of solicitation of prostitution in 2006, after the stepmother of a 14-year-old girl reported to police that an older man had molested her stepdaughter. In Florida, local, state, and federal law enforcement investigated the case for years, compiling extensive evidence from dozens of victims.

But, under pressure from Epstein’s stable of prominent attorneys, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Alexander Acosta negotiated a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) under which Epstein served only 13 months in jail on state charges of solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of a minor. Signed in 2007, the deal shielded Epstein and “any potential co-conspirators” from future federal prosecution by Acosta’s office for a set of sex crimes. The NPA negotiated by Alex Acosta, with its narrow guilty plea and lenient sentence, enabled Epstein to continue his abuse and trafficking activities for almost another decade.

Acosta later served as Secretary of Labor under President Trump from April 2017 until his resignation in July 2019. 

In Shuliak’s case, the complicit helpers were numerous, according to the Times.

Shuliak had always wanted to be a dentist. In 2012, after Columbia’s College of Dental Medicine initially rejected her, Epstein asked his dentist, Dr. Thomas J. Magnani, a powerful alumnus, to put him in contact with the dental school dean. Mr. Epstein dangled the idea of making up to a $10 million donation. In the end, he would give only about $210,000 to Columbia, according to an accounting by the university, but it was enough to grease the wheels.

Then Dr. James Fine, a dental school administrator, gave Dr. Shuliak a heads-up on the topics she would encounter during an admissions exam in April 2012 to test her practical skills as a transfer student. 

By the time she applied to Columbia in 2012, Shuliak had overstayed the student visa she had obtained in 2010. Epstein chose, from the ranks of his assistants, a 30-year-old woman from Minnesota to be her spouse and the women were married three weeks later at the Office of the City Clerk.

After the wedding, a Brooklyn immigration lawyer unnamed by the Times who worked for Epstein submitted an immigration form stating that the woman wanted to list Dr. Shuliak as her wife and beneficiary. The request was approved, and unnamed complicit immigration officials dismissed Shuliak’s pending deportation proceedings. Months after the marriage, Shuliak got a green card, making her a lawful resident. Attempts to use marriage to get a U.S. green card usually face very strict checks, with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) looking closely at applications to stop marriage fraud. In May 2018, she officially became a U.S. citizen, then divorced her spouse a year later.

According to the 2026 report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Shuliak’s former wife claimed she had been forced into marriage. Even though the report concluded that the marriage may have been done to provide Shuliak with the “legal basis to continue residing in the United States” it didn’t recommend any legal challenge to her citizenship. You could consider that failure being complicit in fraud as well. 

The congressional report is replete with stories of people who helped Epstein in his pursuit of women to abuse. 

According to the report, New York immigration lawyer, Mehmet Arda Beskardes, worked closely with Epstein from 2013 to 2018, helping Epstein arrange visas and other immigration documents for the women in his network. On one occasion, the report said, he may have facilitated an illusory marriage between Shuliak, and one of Epstein’s victims, apparently to provide Shuliak a legal basis to continue residing in the United States.

Epstein’s accountant, Richard Kahn, also wrote a letter to immigration authorities in support of the marriage, later acknowledging that the letter was “embellished”, the report said. 

The Times reported further that in 2023, when Shuliak applied for a postdoctoral dental program at Columbia, apparently to fulfill a requirement she needed to obtain a license to practice in the state, the same two dentists who helped her gain admission to Columbia in 2012 once again came to her assistance, according to a copy of her admissions file reviewed by The Times. The file shows that Dr. Fine, the dean overseeing Columbia’s postgraduate residency programs, created a special “faculty internship” for her at the Midtown Manhattan dental practice he shared with Dr. Magnani.

Both men gave her their highest recommendation for the program, the Times said, from which she graduated in May 2025. 

It looks like the roster of those complicit in Epstein’s predations also may include some officials at the Interlochen Center for the Arts in Michigan, which Epstein attended as a teenage bassoonist and later supported with donations.

On July 28, 2026, the New York Times reported that Epstein returned to mingle with students, several of whom later said they had been subjected to his grooming and abuse. A report by a law firm hired by the school included the accounts of two of the three former Interlochen students who have described disturbing encounters with Mr. Epstein. In one case, a woman told the investigators of going to meet him at the campus lodge where “Epstein engaged in sexual conduct with her….” 

The Times said the report included additional claims by a former Interlochen student who told investigators that Epstein had paid for her to fly to New York the summer after she graduated, and that she had given him a massage at his home and he “may have asked her to remove her top.” Her mother called Interlochen, her mother told investigators, to warn the school that Mr. Epstein was “preying on their students,” but they said no one from Interlochen had followed up.

And the list of those complicit in Epstein’s behavior goes on. It’s criminal.

Will all these complicit people pay a price. Maybe not in the courts, but, hopefully in their souls. As Dostoevsky wrote in The Brothers Karamazov, “Above all, don’t lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others.”

Are Socialists Taking Over Colorado And Beyond?

In Colorado’s June 2026 primaries, 29-year-old Democratic Socialist Melat Kiros unseated 15-term incumbent Rep. Diana DeGette in the dark-blue 1st Congressional District, which consists largely of Denver residents. 

As the overwhelming favorite against her Republican opponent in November’s general election, Kiros, 29, is expected to be the first self-identified socialist to be elected to Congress in Colorado history.

“We just proved that if you organize the people, you can beat the organized money,” Kiros told Colorado Newsline after her win. “And we’re going to replicate it in races all across the state.”

Will they?

Before pundits and the public accept this assertion, let’s step back and examine what just happened in Colorado’s 1stCongressional District. 

The numbers suggest that the real victor was voter apathy, as in so many political contests across the country. Non-voters default to being led by the preferences of voters. That, combined with the creation of safe party districts, is increasingly turning primaries into the real elections. 

Bear with me now.

In looking at the 1st Congressional District race, it’s important to recognize that it was limited to registered Democrats and unaffiliated voters. There are 477,098 active registered voters in the district. Of those, 187,317 are registered as Democrats and 236,454 are registered as Unaffiliated voters. So, the number of eligible voters in the Democratic primary totaled 423,771.

But only 157,645 people, or 37.2 % of those eligible, voted in the primary. 

That translated into 83,855 for Kiros, 62,715 for DeGette and 11,075 for the Democratic party candidate, Wanda James.  In other words, the Democratic Socialist Melat Kiros won the primary with just 19.79 % of eligible voters, only a few more than would fit in the Denver Bronco’s stadium.

Overwhelming? A massive sign of a cultural shift? A rejection of a more moderate political climate?  I don’t think so.  

A similar situation in New York City is why caution is warranted in interpreting recent races.  

“Turnout in New York’s closed primary races is typically small—even Mamdani  won last year’s Democratic mayoral primary with less than 7 percent of the city’s overall population backing him,” City Journal reported. “Tuesday’s results do not prove, then, that the majority of residents in New York are hard-left socialists. They instead suggest that, since most potential voters remain politically apathetic, a small but well-organized machine like the DSA’s can deliver big results.”

There’s a parallel here with Democratic Socialist Janeese Lewis George’s victory in Washington, D.C’s mayoral Democratic primary, which has led some to declare her win a mandate. There are approximately 357,000 registered Democrats in Washington, D.C., making up roughly 75% of all registered voters in the District. Only about 38% of registered Democrats voted and George won with just 75,000 votes. A mandate? Hardly. 

So, calm down folks. 

This isn’t to say that the new socialist legislators in the House won’t be able to muck things up. 

As commentator Gerard Baker has observed, “The victory by “democratic socialists” and their allies in New York Democratic  primaries last week is a signal moment in the nation’s descent into political dystopia. Sure, we can overstate its importance. New York isn’t America. What passes for cool radicalism in Brooklyn’s Park Slope would get you a psychiatric evaluation in most of the country.”

In addition, if Democrats retake the House in November, their margin is likely to be slim and an enlarged cadre of disruptors will be able to challenge leadership. Republicans are also likely to try to tar the entire Democratic Party for its association with the Democratic Socialists. President Trump has already called the socialist nominees “godless” communists who are threatening the country. At a Faith and Freedom Coalition gathering, he urged religious conservatives to prevent a “communist” victory in the midterms,saying his pro-Christian policies would be reversed if Democrats returned to power. 

Hang on. 

Washington, D.C.’s Lafayette Park: Don’t Fence Me In

Lafayette Park north of the White House is one of the most prominent hubs for political protests in the country and a beacon for the first amendment.

So, of course, President Trump, not content with destroying the Rose Garden and the West Wing, is continuing his rampage through Washington’s landmarks with a move to permanently surround the park with an 8-9 ft. fence. That would allow the park to be closed at Trump’s discretion.

On Thursday, July 16, the Commission of Fine Arts, a federal design panel stuffed with Trump supplicants, indicated support for the plan. 

“This is definitely the president’s park, but also the people’s park, and it’s to be made open, but also closeable, so that it can be made safe,” James C. McCrery II, the vice chair of the Commission, told the New York Times.

Safe for whom? Safe from whom?

The park has long been the site of multiple political protests, including picketing by suffragists demanding voting rights, protests for women’s rights and the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), demonstrations by civil rights and anti-war activists, LGBTQ activists, anti-nuclear war encampments, and Black Lives Matter demonstrations.

In 2021, the National Park Service and the White House Historical Association added three wayside markers on the north side of the park that tell the story of protest in the park, the construction of the White House by free and enslaved laborers, and the influence of First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy in preserving the character of the park.

In this Library of Congress photo from 1917, suffragists march with banners, picketing outside on the sidewalk in front of the White House.

The Secret Service, the Executive Office of the President and the Department of the Interior claim they want to install the permanent fence so the park can be closed during “heightened conditions.”

A demonstrator hold up flags at a rally for D.C. Democracy in Lafayette Park near the White House in Washington, Saturday, June 25, 2011. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)

NPR ran the AP photo above by Luis Alvarez of a rally in Lafayette Park to show how close protesters were able to get to the White House without barriers in 2011. Trump wants to push them back, way back.

“What this fencing represents, to me, is the worst of what the new attitude toward politics represents,” Marty Pearl, 83, who brought a “Hate Won’t Make America Great” sign to the area, told NPR. “And that is imperialism, fascism, dictatorship, because what dictators do is isolate themselves from the people they rule. That is not, for me, the way democracies can possibly work.”

He’s right. Putting our political leaders more and more behind barriers and keeping them more and more distant from the people they serve diminishes our democracy. 

And Trump doesn’t want to stop with the fence.

In June, the Washington Post disclosed that Trump is secretly planting a monument to himself in Lafayette Square in the form of 47 maple trees as a nod to being the 47th president. 

Enough!

Are Socialists Taking Over the Democratic Party?

Hyperventilating political prognosticators don’t always get it right. 

“(New York City) Mayor Zohran Mamdani and his Democratic Socialists of America are now the most capable political force in the Democratic Party heading into 2028,” John Ketcham and Christian Browne at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative policy think tank, just wrote in City Journal. “In yesterday’s primaries in New York, his three endorsed candidates beat better-established adversaries, demonstrating how Mamdani and the DSA have become the face of the party’s progressive wing.”

“…the Democratic Party has been taken over by socialists,” says Republican Rep. Mike Lawler, who represents a suburban New York House seat.

Zeteo, a left-leaning digital media company, says “a new politics is brewing. And the epicenter is New York City.”

Wait a minute. Before other pundits and the public accept this assertion, let’s step back and examine what just happened in New York City, focusing on one of the winning socialist candidates, Darializa Avila Chevalier.

32-year-old Chevalier is no shrinking violet. In 2020, she branded Joe Biden a “rapist” and a “war criminal” and called the US a “fucking disgrace”. The day after the horrific October 7, 2023, Hamas massacre of Jews in Israel, she joined a pro-Palestinian rally in Times Square organized by leftist groups that appeared to celebrate the event. In posts onTwitter from 2018 through 2022, she maligned interracial relationships. She’s written that Russia invaded Ukraine because the United States had “been bullying Russia”. In a tweet disparaging America, she wrote, “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me”. 

Voter apathy in primary races is the culprit here, as in so many political contests across the country. That, combined with the creation of safe districts across the country, is increasingly causing primaries to be the real elections.

In looking at the New York primary race, it’s important to recognize not only that the race was limited to registered Democrats, of which there are 373,000 in the District NY-13, but that only 67,473 voters participated in the primary, or 18.09 percent. That allowed the Democratic Socialists to wield disproportionate influence. Of those, who bothered to vote, just 32,790 voted for Chevalier, who came out ahead of her main challenger, Adriano Espaillat, by only 2,326 votes.

City Journal acknowledged this in a post on June 27: “Turnout in New York’s closed primary races is typically small—even Mamdani won last year’s Democratic mayoral primary with less than 7 percent of the city’s overall population backing him. Tuesday’s results do not prove, then, that the majority of residents in New York are hard-left socialists. They instead suggest that, since most potential voters remain politically apathetic, a small but well-organized machine like the DSA’s can deliver big results.”

There’s a parallel here with Democratic Socialist Janeese Lewis George’s  victory in Washington, D.C’s mayoral Democratic primary, which has led some to declare her win a mandate. There are approximately 357,000 registered Democrats in Washington, D.C., making up roughly 75% of all registered voters in the District. Only about 38% of registered Democrats voted and Janeese Lewis George won with just 75,000 votes. A mandate? Hardly.

So, calm down folks.

This isn’t to say, however, that the new socialist legislators in the House, largely a result of voter lethargy, won’t muck things up.

As commentator Gerard Baker has observed, “The victory by “democratic socialists” and their allies in New York Democratic primaries last week is a signal moment in the nation’s descent into political dystopia. In it we see a Democratic base, relatively small in number but energized by anti-Trump rage, that has decided that the Black Lives Matter, No Such Thing as a Woman, Mostly Peaceful Rioting that the party nourished under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is too timid for their tastes.

Sure, we can overstate its importance. New York isn’t America. What passes for cool radicalism in Brooklyn’s Park Slope would get you a psychiatric evaluation in most of the country.”

Also, even if the Democrats retake the House in November, their margin is likely to be slim and an enlarged cadre of disruptors will be able to challenge leadership. Republicans are also likely to try to tar the entire Democratic Party for its association with the Democratic Socialists. President Trump has already called the socialist nominees “godless” communists who are threatening the country. At a Faith and Freedom Coalition gathering, he urged religious conservatives to prevent a “communist” victory in the midterms, saying his pro-Christian policies would be reversed if Democrats returned to power. 

And right on cue, Mike Marinella, a spokesperson for National Republican Congressional Committee, said, “Tonight wasn’t just a bad night for so-called ‘Leader’ Hakeem Jeffries. It was the night the Democrat establishment officially surrendered to Zohran Mamdani and the socialist wing of their party. Every House Democrat, in safe and competitive districts alike, will now answer to the radicals calling the shots. And Americans should be terrified by where the Democrat Party is headed.”

Hang on.

Kotek A Winner? Please, No.

A YouTube channel called Election Time recently ran an item showing Democrat Tina Kotek polling at 45% and Republican Christine Drazan at 44% in the governor’s race. 

And this isn’t the only outlet saying Kotek has the advantage. 

“While Oregon’s 40-year history of electing Democratic governors and the state’s strong distaste for Republican President Donald Trump suggest Drazan has a difficult road ahead of her,” the Oregon Capital Chronicle opined on May 26. And I recently heard a couple political analysts on OPB saying Kotek will likely win it all again. 

They can’t be serious. 

This is the “Tax Everything that moves Kotek” who just tried to pull a fast one on Oregonians by shifting a despised transportation tax measure to May in hopes reduced voter participation would doom it, but still saw more than 83% of voters across the political spectrum reject it. 

This is the leader of Oregon’s Democratic party that has fostered an  anti-business climate for decades, enabled horrendous K-12 school performance despite high per pupil spending, filled the state Supreme Court with liberal judges ever since the administration of Republican Victor Atiyeh, whose term ended in January 1987, and exploded the state budget since then, increasing it from $12.57 billion in 1987-1989 to $138.9 billion in 2025-2027.

It’s the party that gleefully accepted, and then stalled returning, a $500,000 contribution from a disgraced and bankrupt crypto company after the U.S. Attorney’s Office requested it return the money to the federal government. 

This is a party so beholden to unions, which represent just 15% of working Oregonians, that it enacted a law to pay striking public and private workers unemployment benefits, that has watched Oregon’s business reputation tank in national rankings, that tolerates underperforming K-12 schools while suspending the requirement that high school students must pass standardized proficiency exams (the “Essential Skills” requirement) to graduate, that has watched the projected cost of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project swell from $4.8 billion to $14.4 billion, and potentially $17.7 billion.

Oregon is in trouble and continuing Democratic Party control isn’t the solution.   

Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire.

President Trump doesn’t just make a mistake once in a while when he speaks. He’s a veritable fountain of blunders, a gusher of goofs, steadily adding to the nonsense his administration spews out.

When he took some time off during a May 7 drive over the surface of the drained Reflecting Pool in his 22,000 pound presidential limousine, nicknamed “The Beast,” to deliver some remarks and answer questions from the press, the event was, as usual, a cavalcade of small and large misstatements from start to finish. Here’s a snapshot of things he said in just that one case, while a grinning, tuxedo-clad Secretary of the Interior Doug Bergum, who is overseeing the renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, stood by.

  • Trump: “The Reflecting Pool (on the National Mall at the Lincoln Memorial) was built in 1922”. Close, but no cigar. The original was completed in 1923.
  • Trump: “The Reflecting Pool is 2400 ft. long.” Close again, but no cigar. It is 2,030 ft. long. 
  • Trump: “It is taller than any building in the world laid on its side.” Nope. The Burj Khalifa in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, is the tallest building in the world at 2,717 ft, followed by the Merdeka 118 building in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia at 2,233 ft.
  • Trump: “Obama spent 38 million dollars over 2.5 years (renovating the pool).” A 2012 renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool cost $34 million and took roughly 18 months.
  • Trump: “The estimate to fix (the Reflecting Pool) was $300 million, we’re going to do it for $1.8 million.”  The Biden administration studied replacing the iconic pool’s granite, which had an estimated cost of $301 million, but never embarked on the project. Trump has said at various times that his renovation, involving cleaning the granite lining the basin and coating it in an “American flag blue” will cost $1.5 – $3 million. The government has already agreed to pay the company doing the job, under a no-bid contract, $6.9 million and the Park Service’s internal estimates indicate the cost could exceed $12million. On May 11, The New York Times reported that on May 8 the Interior Department added $6.2 million to the contract’s previous cost, saying it now planned to pay $13.1 million to a Virginia firm, Atlantic Industrial Coatings. Then on May 12, The New York Times reported Trump was downplaying his connection with the firm. “Mr. Trump did an about-face early Tuesday, distancing himself from the company. “I didn’t give out the contract, ‘Interior’ did, to a contractor I did not know, and have never used before,” Mr. Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform,” the NYT reported.
  • Trump: “We didn’t have a safe (Washington, D.C.) city in my first term. Crime is down now 88% – 92%.”  Data indicates that crime in Washington, D.C., has experienced a significant decline during 2025 and early 2026, but the 88%–92% figure is a fictional, exaggerated number. Allegations are also being investigated that DC police have manipulated data to show lower crime numbers. As of May 2026, multiple DC police officials face discipline over allegations of manipulating crime classifications.
  • Trump: “My triumphal arch (proposed for Memorial Circle on Columbia Island, a traffic circle on Memorial Drive between the end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge and Arlington National Cemetery) will be number 60 in arches in the world.” Trump’s proposed “Triumphal Arch” or “Arc to Trump”, designed to dwarf the 164-foot Arc de Triomphe in Paris, is planned to be 250 feet tall, over twice the height of the 99-foot Lincoln Memorial, which would make it the largest triumphal arch in the world, but not the 60th. 
  • Trump: “They (US military) are on average knocking out 8 Iranian fast boats a day.” Secretary of state Marco Rubio has said U.S. Forces recently destroyed 7 Iranian Fast Boats in an incident in the Strait of Hormuz, but that rate is not occurring each day. 
  • Trump: “I got Americans out of foreign countries and I don’t pay $6 billion dollars to get somebody out, like Biden used to do and Obama, they gave 6 billion dollars to get some person out.” The Biden administration facilitated the release of $6 billion in frozen Iranian assets in September 2023 to secure the release of five American citizens detained in Iran, though the funds were Iranian oil revenues, not U.S. taxpayer money.
  • Trump: “We’ve taken in hundreds of billions in tariffs, and we’re taking it from countries that have ripped us off for years.”  U.S. importers and consumers bear 94%–96% of the tariff burden, not foreign countries, with the costs essentially functioning as a tax on American households.  Foreign exporters bear a very small fraction of the cost, sometimes reducing their prices slightly to remain competitive, but they do not pay the tariff directly.
  • Trump: “Gas prices have come way down.” As of early May 2026, U.S. gas prices have not been coming “way down” and are actually elevated. On May 7, AAA reported drivers are seeing another sharp increase at the pump, with the national average for a gallon of regular gasoline rising 25 cents for the second consecutive week to $4.55. Pump prices are now $1.40 higher than they were a year ago. 
  • Trump: “The stock market today, for the 59th time since I’ve been president, hit a new high.” The stock market did not, in fact, hit a new high on May 7. All three major indexes dropped. The S&P fell 28 points, the NASDAQ fell 32 points, and the Dow fell over 300 points on Thursday, bringing it back below 50,000 after its surge the previous day.
  • Trump: “The construction workers, they all voted for me. I’d say 99-100 %.” Non-union construction workers are a large and influential voting bloc and a significant number voted for Trump in 2024, but union members and their families largely stuck with the Democratic presidential nominee, with Vice-President Harris winning 54% of union household votes.
  • Trump: “We think we’re going to have it (the ballroom) done by July 4th.” On July 31, 2025, the White House issued a statement that a 90,000 sq. ft. addition would be made to the White House to incorporate a 650-person capacity ballroom.The project was set to begin in September 2025 and planned to be completed “long before” the end of the President’s term in 2029. In December 2025, a National Park Service report said a much larger ballroom would be completed by 2028. The project’s above-ground construction has faced legal challenges, with construction as of April 18 being allowed to continue only until June 2026.

And as usual, Trump took an opportunity to bash a woman reporter, ABC’s Rachel Scott, who asked, “Why focus on all these projects as gas prices are soaring? Part of Trump’s response – “Such a stupid question that you asked. Maybe you can understand dirt better than I can baby, but I don’t allow it. This is one of the worst reporters. She’s from ABC fake news and she’s a horror show. A question like that is a disgrace to our country.”

Another day in Trump-world.

Republican Lobbyist Shows “Scam PACs” are Alive and Well

There’s so much money sloshing around in American politics a lot of questionable activities get overlooked, like the sweet thing Virginia lobbyist Robert J. “Rob” Catron has going on. 

Robert J. “Rob” Catron

A native of South Florida and a graduate of Florida State University, Catron worked as Chief of Staff for Rep. Ed. Schrock, a conservative Virginia Republican, during 2001 – 2003. He later joined the Arlington, VA-based lobbying firm of Alcalde & Fay, where he’s now a Partner. According to the firm, he is “a proud veteran of the United States Army Reserve” and “has successfully managed or consulted on more than 50 winning political campaigns for federal, state and local offices”.

On December 4, 2023, Catron registered Ranger PAC, a political action committee, with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). Based in Athens, Georgia, the PAC says its mission is to support the election of “highly accomplished conservative military veterans to Congress to defend the Constitution and get America squared away”.

The focus on veterans is an exploitation of the fact that although public trust in many institutions is in retreat, the public generally still has high confidence in veterans as effective leaders in civic life. 

Ranger PAC’s treasurer is Paul Kilgore, CEO of Professional Data Services Inc (PDS), a political financial consulting company in Athens he founded in 1999 that is a leading compliance firm in Republican politics. In 2024, Kilgore represented more than 157 Republican candidates.

From January 1, 2025 to November 30, 2025, Catron’s Ranger PAC raised $1,394,894.74, according to its filing with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). In the same period, it spent $1,353,836.73.

The problem is that, in a deliberate assault on trust, Catron’s Ranger PAC spent just $69,500, 5% of its total spending, on aspiring or serving politicians. That’s right, a measly 5%. The rest, 95%, went to fundraising and administrative expenses.

Although there’s no legal minimum percentage of money raised that a PAC must donate to candidates, legitimate PACs generally spend less than a quarter of their donations on fundraising, with many spending considerably less. 

Charity Navigator, an independent non-profit organization that evaluates U.S. charities on their financial health, accountability and transparency, encourages nonprofits to spend no more than 30% combined on administrative and fundraising costs. Organizations earning the highest scores spend less than 10 cents to raise $1 (a 10% ratio).

In Ranger PAC’s case, it added insult to injury: 5 the 19 politicians who received donations from January 1, 2025 to November 30, 2025 weren’t even veterans.[1]

The Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates betrayals of public trust, calls PACs like Ranger PAC “Scam PACS”. They purport to raise money for political and social causes, but spend most of the money they raise from unsuspecting donors on fundraising, salaries and overhead.

In 2015, Politico reported, for example, that a PAC called the Black Republican PAC spent less than 1 percent of the $700,000 it raised on contributions to candidates or ads supporting them, according to government filings. 

The FBI warns: “Scam PACs are fraudulent political action committees designed to reroute political contributions for personal financial gain. This is a federal crime—and can be costly to victims who thought they were making legitimate campaign contributions.”

If most of the money Ranger PAC raised didn’t go to candidates, where did it go?

$19,641.81 went to Paul Kilgore’s Professional Data Services Inc for “PAC Compliance Consulting”. 

Most of the rest went primarily to enriching 10 firms involved in fundraising[2] , some of them with shadowy histories. 

The website for Better Mousetrap Digital, which Ranger PAC paid $25,291.33, says it “is the premier digital fundraising consulting firm for Republicans…with decades of experience spanning from state house campaigns to the White House”. 

Better Mousetrap Digital’s founder is Jack Daly. The company’s website doesn’t note that in December 2023, Daly was sentenced to 4 months’ imprisonment for conspiring to (i) commit mail fraud by defrauding thousands of conservative political donors out of money and (ii) lie to the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”). He was also ordered to pay a $20,000 fine, along with two separate payments of $69,978.37 for restitution and forfeiture.

Daly emerged from federal custody, nevertheless, to re-establish himself as a top Republican Party campaign fundraiser. NOTUS reported in Oct. 2025 that dozens of federal-level Republican political committees — including the Republican National Committee, numerous congressional committees and campaign operations tied to President Donald Trump — had together spent nearly $18 million on digital fundraising, donor lists and other services from Better Mousetrap Digital.

The FBI says it is actively looking for Scam PACs that only spend money on telemarketing and junk mail. It urges Americans targeted by a scam PAC to contact their local FBI office and ask to speak to an election crimes coordinator. 

Unfortunately, scam PACs have been around for a while.

“Since the tea party burst into the political landscape in 2009, the conservative movement has been plagued by an explosion of PACs that critics say exist mostly to pad the pockets of the consultants who run them,” Politico wrote in 2014. “They collect large piles of small checks that, taken together, add up to enough money to potentially sway a Senate race. But the PACs plow most of their cash back into payments to consulting firms for additional fundraising efforts.”

A POLITICO analysis of reports filed with the Federal Election Commission covering the 2014 cycle found 33 PACs that courted small donors with tea party-oriented email and direct-mail appeals raised $43 million, but spent only $3 million on ads and contributions to boost the long-shot candidates often touted in the appeals.

In 2016, two Democratic FEC commissioners, Ellen Weintraub and Ann M. Ravel, urged their colleagues to take action against scam PACs, but there’s been little follow-up. On January 31, 2025, President Trump sent a brief letter to Weintraub firing her “effective immediately” as a FEC Commissioner and Chair. Weintraub challenged her dismissal, but is no longer serving on the commission.  Ravel resigned from the FEC in February 2017. Weintraub has not been replaced, denying the FEC a quorum for votes.

During 2002 – 2018, Virginia political operative Scott B. Mackenzie served as treasurer of 12 PACs that spent 68% of the money they raised on fundraising, wages and administration. But he paid a price. In 2020, a Federal District Judge sentenced him to 12 months and one day in prison for making false statements to the FEC in relation to his association with the PACs. Mackenzie also had to pay $172,200 in restitution.

“If the Justice Department was seeking to send a message to others tempted to get into the ‘scam PAC’ game, that message came through loud and clear,” said Brett Kappel, a campaign finance lawyer at the Akerman law. “These are not victimless crimes and people will go to prison for them.”

It looks like Catron hasn’t gotten that message, even though he’s been in trouble before. 

In June 2021, he was indicted by a Virginia Beach grand jury on 10 counts of making false statements and election fraud. He avoided prison when he pleaded no contest to three election-related charges. The charges stemmed from a petition scandal during a Republican congressman’s ultimately losing 2018 campaign for a second term in Congress representing a coastal Virginia district. Catron was accused of being involved in an effort to get a third-party spoiler candidate on the ballot with petitions using forged signatures.

Catron received a three-year suspended sentence and was ordered to pay court costs and fines after entering the plea to three counts of neglect of election duty. 

With his Ranger PAC antics, maybe it’s time to bring morally hollow Robert J. “Rob” Catron back to court.


[1] Recipients of Ranger PAC donations, January 1, 2025 – November 30, 2025

Donation RecipientDonation ($)Service
Matt Van Epps, Tennessee  10,000Army
Michael Whatley, N. Carolina  5,000Not a veteran
Ronny Jackson, Texas   8,500Navy
Derrick Van Orden, Wisconsin    5,000Navy
Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Iowa   5,000Army
Zach Nunn, Iowa      5,000Air Force
Gabe Evans, Colorado    5,000Army
Tom Barrett, Michigan    5,000Army
Stewart Whitson, Virginia   1,000Army
Dan Butierez, Arizona    1,000Not a veteran
Jen Kiggans, Virginia    5,000Navy
Ryan Zinke, Montana     5,000Navy
Pat Harrigan, N. Carolina   2,000Army
Nick Lalota, New York  1,000Navy
Ken Calvert, California    1,000Not a veteran
Warren Davidson, Ohio    1,000Army
Abraham Hamadeh, Arizona  2,000Army
Randy Fine, Florida    1,000Not a veteran
Jimmy Patronis, Florida   1,000Not a veteran 

[2] Recipient / percent of total disbursements / Total disbursement

DIRECT SUPPORT SERVICES   17.15%

$232,119.45

ONE VOICE SOLUTIONS   14.29%

$193,522.35

CONSOLIDATED MAILING SERVICES.  9.23%

$124,999.46

DRAGONFLY CONSULTING   9.1%

$123,200.00

FORTHRIGHT STRATEGY, INC.   7.78%

$105,323.46

LAUNCHPAD STRATEGIES, LLC.  3.9%

$52,765.05

TAILWINDS POLITICAL   3.89%

$52,686.42

NAMS-NORTH AMERICAN FULFILLMENT.  3.56%

$48,140.77

DIRECT SUPPORT SYSTEMS   3%

$40,677.94

BETTER MOUSETRAP DIGITAL    1.87%

$25,291.33

Chocolate Milk: Richard Grenell on The Kennedy Center

A January 2, 2026 PBS NewsHour interview with Richard Grenell, President Trump’s choice to lead the now renamed Trump-Kennedy Center was a classic lesson in evasiveness. 

According to The New Yorker, Kennedy Center staff and others often liken Grenell to Grendel, the “powerful demon, a prowler through the dark” in Beowulf. In his PBS interview, he showed he has another talent.

Richard Grenell

Co-Anchor Amna Nawaz led off with a direct question, asking him to respond to a report that a number of artists had chosen to cancel or pull out of performances at the Center because of the president’s takeover of the Center’s board and the renaming of the Kennedy Center. 

“Chocolate milk,” Grenell replied. 

Well, not exactly. 

That’s how I characterize non-answers. 

Grenell might as well have said “chocolate milk” because his response completely ignored the question and immediately veered off into an allegation that NewsHour had consistently failed to cover the Center’s finances. 

“At the Trump-Kennedy Center, we have 19 unions. It’s incredibly expensive to go and put on performances,” he whined. “We cannot have unpopular programming that doesn’t pay the bills.”

“How about ticket sales at the Center.,” Nawas asked. ‘Are ticket sales down? Is that confirmed or not?”

Grenell’s response. “I find it to be outrageous that PBS is not reporting on the phenomenon that arts institutions have been having for decades. Since President Trump has arrived at the now Trump-Kennedy Center, we have raised more than $130 million, blowing away all other fund-raising, and that’s corporate donors who are coming back because they trust the programming.”

In other words, “Chocolate milk”.

And so it went, on and on.

Nawas said,Viewership for the Kennedy Center Honors were down dramatically. Does that — as a steward of this institution, does all of this, the backlash, the headlines about artists pulling out, the fact that so few people paid attention to the Honors, does that worry you?”

Grenell: “If you go to CBS, they will tell you that the CBS Trump-Kennedy Center Honors this year tied for number one in its demographic.” In other words, it did well with a specific segment of the tv audience in that time period, not total viewers. 

In other words, “Chocolate milk”.

Politicians have long evaded media questions, but Trump and his minions have raised it to an art form, figuring there’s little or no downside these days to giving a word salad answer or sequeing to a completely unrelated topic.  

Donald Trump himself is the role model for his administration in this behavior.

His stream-of-consciousness speaking style, involving long seemingly unscripted statements that veer from topic to topic, is a practiced deceit allowing him to avoid directly answering questions. He has referred to his meandering speaking style as the purposeful “weave”. In his case, however, it could just as well be a rambling sign of muddled thinking and cognitive decline. 

 As Sir Walter Scott understood: “Oh, what a tangled web we weave,/ when first we practise to deceive!”

The Destruction of American Diplomacy Is Underway

Piece by piece, President Donald Trump is dismantling America’s representation and reputation around the world.

With about 80 U.S. ambassador posts worldwide already vacant, the Trump administration has abruptly recalled nearly 30 career ambassadors at U.S. embassies around the world. They’ve been directed to vacate their posts by Jan. 15 or 16, 2026. Most of the affected ambassadors are at diplomatic posts in Africa, but the removals are also impacting posts in Europe,

Africa was hit the hardest, with about a dozen ambassadors or chiefs of mission recalled from Niger, Uganda, Senegal, Somalia, Côte d’Ivoire, Mauritius, Nigeria, Gabon, Congo, Burundi, Cameroon, and Rwanda. In the Middle East, heads of mission were recalled from Egypt and Algeria. European chiefs of mission were also recalled from Slovakia, Montenegro, Armenia and North Macedonia.

A senior department official told the Journal the recall was part of a standard process to reassess ambassadors in any administration and that it’s the president’s right to ensure he has envoys in place who advance his foreign-policy agenda.

The damage done by the vacancies is compounded by the questionable quality of some of Trump’s ambassadors who are already confirmed .

For example, Herschel Walker, a former professional football player who ran unsuccessfully as the Republican party’s nominee in the 2022 U.S. Senate election in Georgia, is Trump’s s ambassador to the Bahamas. Then there’s Charles Kushner, a disbarred attorney who in 2005 was convicted of illegal campaign contributions,  tax evasion and witness tampering, and who happens to be the father of Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Charles Kushner is Trump’s Ambassador to France and Monaco. And there’s Kimberly Guilfoyle, Trump’s Ambassador to Greece. She’s a former Fox News personality and Donald Trump Jr.s ex- fiancée.

The American Foreign Service Association (AFSA) , which represents the U.S. foreign service and career diplomats, said the recall represents “a steady erosion of norms, transparency, and professional independence in the Foreign Service.”

“Abrupt, unexplained recalls reflect the same pattern of institutional sabotage and politicization our survey data shows is already harming morale, effectiveness, and U.S. credibility abroad,” AFSA said.

The United States is going to pay a steep price for President Trump’s reckless moves undermining our country’s diplomatic authority.

Already Vacant U.S. Ambassador Posts

PostCurrent Ambassador
AfghanistanVACANT
AlbaniaVACANT
  
Angola and São Tomé & PríncipeVACANT
APECVACANT
ASEANVACANT
AustraliaVACANT
AzerbaijanVACANT
BarbadosVACANT
BelarusVACANT
BelizeVACANT
BoliviaVACANT
Bosnia and HerzegovinaVACANT
BrazilVACANT
BulgariaVACANT
BurmaVACANT*
CambodiaVACANT
Central African RepublicVACANT
ChadVACANT
EcuadorVACANT
El SalvadorVACANT
Eswatini (formerly Swaziland)VACANT
The GambiaVACANT
GeorgiaVACANT
GermanyVACANT
GhanaVACANT
GuineaVACANT
HaitiVACANT
HondurasVACANT
IAEAVACANT
IcelandVACANT
IndonesiaVACANT
IraqVACANT
JamaicaVACANT
KenyaVACANT
KosovoVACANT
LesothoVACANT
LiberiaVACANT
LibyaVACANT
MalawiVACANT
MauritaniaVACANT
MoldovaVACANT
MozambiqueVACANT
New Zealand, Cook Islands and NiueVACANT
NicaraguaVACANT
NorwayVACANT
OECDVACANT
OSCEVACANT
PakistanVACANT
ParaguayVACANT
QatarVACANT
RussiaVACANT
SamoaVACANT
Saudi ArabiaVACANT
SerbiaVACANT
SeychellesVACANT
SloveniaVACANT
Solomon IslandsVACANT
South KoreaVACANT
SudanVACANT
SyriaVACANT
TanzaniaVACANT
Timor-LesteVACANT
TogoVACANT
TongaVACANT
Trinidad and TobagoVACANT
UkraineVACANT
United Arab EmiratesVACANT
UN / Conf. on DisarmamentVACANT
UN / GenevaVACANT
UN / Human Rights CouncilVACANT
UN / ViennaVACANT
UNESCOVACANT
VenezuelaVACANT

Information taken from www.whitehouse.gov and foreign.senate.gov.

Beyond the Pale: Trump Steps Over the Line in Anti-Immigrant Rant

How dare you, Donald Trump. 

“Go back to where you came from”, he said to the Somali immigrants in Minnesota, employing an insulting slur unacceptable in polite society. 

Last week Trump said on his social media channel, Truth Social, he’d send Somalis “back to where they came from.” Yesterday he said Somalis in the U.S. should “go back to where they came from and fix it.”

A person familiar with Trump’s plans told the Associated Press federal authorities are preparing a targeted immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota that would primarily focus on Somali immigrants living unlawfully in the U.S.

At a cabinet meeting yesterday, Trump said Somalis “contribute nothing.” 

“I don’t want them in our country,” a snarling Trump told reporters. “Their country is no good for a reason. Your country stinks and we don’t want them in our country.”

I remember hearing that taunt directed at minorities by racist know-nothings in my youth in the 1950s, but I thought people had long ago been shamed from uttering it. 

Trump, however, seems to enjoy denigrating “the other”.

Trump’s own Equal Employment Opportunity Commission cites “Go back to where you came from,” as an example of unlawful workplace conduct, along with the use of “insults, taunting, or ethnic epithets”.

I suppose in some respects nobody should really be surprised by Trump’s insults. That’s his modus operandi. Demean and slander his opponents, particularly those he deems not “real” Americans.  And his supporters often embrace his scurrilous attacks.

He even goes after members of Congress with abandon. He has described Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar, (D-Minn), who came to the United States from Somalia as a refugee and became a citizen 25 years ago, as “garbage.”

“We could go one way or the other, and we’re going to go the wrong way if we keep taking in garbage into our country,” Trump said. “She’s garbage. Her friends are garbage.” 

And Trump’s recent explicit use of hateful speech is not original or unprecedented. It was a feature, not a bug, of his campaigns for office. 

An analysis published by Presidential Studies Quarterly[1] , cited by the National Library of Medicine, concluded that “no other comparable candidate of either major US party has ever approached the level of negativity and vitriol toward racial/ethnic minorities that Trump did.” 

A Washington Post column today by George Will is headlined “A sickening moral slum of an administration”. 

Indeed.


  1. [1] Çinar I, Stokes S, Uribe A. Presidential rhetoric and populism. Presidential Studies Quarterly. 2020;50(2):240–263. doi: 10.1111/psq.12656. [DOI] [Google Scholar]